Gustav Hansson vs Bart Stevens Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W W
Form
L W L L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Hansson 0 - 0 Stevens
They have played 0 sets in total, with Hansson winning 0 and Stevens winning 0. The last match between Hansson and Stevens was at the M15 Kalmar, 18-05-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Gustav Hansson getting the victory w/o.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gustav Hansson | 0 |
| Bart Stevens | 0 |
M15 Kalmar(18-05-2019)
| Hansson | Stats | Stevens |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 862 |
| 540 | Highest Rank | 736 |
| 30 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 69% (92-41) | Career Total W/L | 54% (102-86) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Monteiro VS Quinn PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gustav Hansson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Gustav Hansson
Player
Andrey Chepelev
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
66 of
92)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Vladimir Korolev
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Luka Pavlovic
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Gustav Hansson
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Gustav Hansson
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Guy Den Heijer
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Gustav Hansson
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Bart Stevens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Bart Stevens
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Bart Stevens
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Bart Stevens
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Bart Stevens
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
65 of
111)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Bart Stevens
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Bart Stevens
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
51%
(
37 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Bart Stevens
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Bart Stevens
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
3
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bart Stevens
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
16
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Bart Stevens
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (92/41) | Win/Loss | 54% (102/86) |
| 66% (196/100) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (235/199) |
| 57% (1519/1158) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2120/1931) |
| 74% (25/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (19/17) |
| 69% (61/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (69/61) |
| 55% (6/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (14/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 124 | Aces Total | 402 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 274 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 460.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.54 |
| 64% (2645/4109) | 1st Serve % | 57% (4559/7961) |
| 66% (1748/2645) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3109/4559) |
| 56% (816/1464) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1632/3402) |
| 46% (242/525) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (318/771) |
| 43% (1870/4333) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3087/7807) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Challenger W/L | 10% (1/9) |
| 71% (91/38) | Futures W/L | 57% (101/77) |
| 69% (91/132) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (99/184) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (12/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (22/42) |
| 57% (17/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (28/62) |
| 93% (90/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (104/87) |
| 7% (90/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (104/17) |
| 16% (43/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (84/15) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
